First-hand experiences, with dates, context, and the limits of what they tell us.
Reviewed
User report · Quota
A largely unused Pro account showing 0% Argon quota
The author reports that a second paid Pro account showed no weekly Argon quota despite very little prior Antigravity use. Restarting, updating, and testing a fresh local profile did not change the displayed balance.
Context Windows desktop · self-reported paid AI Pro · two accounts on the same computer and network · client version not stated
What this does not prove
This does not establish a shared device quota, a failed scheduled reset, or a confirmed backend fault. Account eligibility and actual provisioning were not independently verified. Switching accounts is not a demonstrated remedy.
At review, the thread had no replies or confirmed resolution. A visible countdown alone does not explain why the balance is zero.
The author compared Argon High with Flash 3.8 High and reported different quota consumption relative to published API prices. They also observed that usage readings could settle several minutes after a task.
Context Antigravity 2.27.0 · Ultra 5× · Windows · one run per model
What this does not prove
This is a small, self-reported comparison. API prices do not establish a subscription quota conversion rate; the reported ratio is not an official multiplier.
Later replies add tests on other surfaces. We have not independently reproduced the result.
The author reported animation-related CPU activity and a language-server process reaching about 2.9 GB after hours of use. Long conversations also felt increasingly heavy.
The author described a responsive experience with multi-file TypeScript refactoring and new modules, and reported that context held up well during their work.
Context Antigravity App · Argon Medium · personal coding workflow
What this does not prove
A first impression, not a controlled benchmark. The author also promotes a personal development tool in the post.
No independent follow-up test is included in this collection yet.